Author(s)
Md Samiul Azim, Department of English at Gazole Mahavidyalaya, Malda, West Bengal, India
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1923-083X;
Md Akidul Hoque, Department of English at Gazole Mahavidyalaya, Malda, West Bengal, India
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3066-1057;
Farida Parvin, a State Aided College Teacher in the Department of English at Gazole Mahavidyalaya, affiliated with the University of Gour Banga
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0289-5561;
Journal: Polish Journal of English Studies
Issue: 11.2 (2025)
Date: 15/12/2025
Page: 15
Quote As: Azim, Samiul et al., “Cartographies: Relational Ecologies and Decolonial Belonging in the Works of Olga Tokarczuk and Amitav Ghosh”, Polish Journal of English Studies 11.2 (2025): 17-36.
DOI: doi.org/10.64867/pjes.25435981.25.112.1091
Abstract
This article investigates the literary cartographies forged by Olga Tokarczuk and Amitav Ghosh through a comparative analysis of their works, focusing on how mythscapes and memoryscapes engender relational ecologies and decolonial forms of belonging. Against the backdrop of ecological crisis, mass displacement, and epistemic fragmentation in the Anthropocene, both authors craft narrative terrains that unsettle Enlightenment historiography and anthropocentric paradigms. Drawing on posthumanist theory (Barad, Braidotti), multispecies ethics (Haraway, Tsing), and postcolonial ecocriticism (Huggan, Nixon), this study employs close textual analysis to examine how myth, memory, and more-than-human agency configure new forms of community. It combines close reading with comparative ecocritical methods and formal analysis, situating the texts within archival, historical, and affective registers to trace how narrative form mediates ecological knowledge. Tokarczuk’s Flights and Drive Your Plow Over the Bones of the Dead interlace Polish folklore and ecofeminist motifs to challenge human sovereignty, while Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide and Gun Island weave indigenous myths into narratives of environmental precarity and colonial displacement. These texts function as posthuman cartographies—maps of entangled life-worlds where human and nonhuman agencies co-constitute history, kinship, and place. Through fragmented aesthetics, polyvocal narration, and diasporic geographies, Tokarczuk and Ghosh resist the cartographic logics of empire, instead envisioning planetary solidarities rooted in relational ethics. This article argues that their literary forms do not merely reflect ecological entanglement but enact it, generating speculative imaginaries for decolonial futures. By offering empirically grounded interventions into debates on posthuman ethics and decolonial memory, the article advances methodological and pedagogical frameworks for literary studies and suggests policy-relevant imaginaries for cultivating planetary solidarities. In reconfiguring the spatial, temporal, and ontological coordinates of belonging, their works provide crucial insights for re-imagining narrative ethics and global ecologies in a time of planetary instability.
Keywords: posthumanism, decolonial ecocriticism, mythscape, memoryscape, relational ecology, multispecies kinship
Works Cited
Anders, Jarosław. 2021. “Primeval and Other Times by Olga Tokarczuk: The ‘Tender Narrator’ and the Perils of Myth.” The Polish Review 66 (2): 105–17. https://doi.org/10.5406/polishreview.66.2.0105.
Appadurai, Arjun. 1990. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy.” Theory Culture & Society 7 (2–3): 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327690007002017.
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128.
Bell, Duncan. 2003. “Mythscapes: Memory, Mythology, and National Identity.”British Journal of Sociology 54 (1): 63–81.
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2006. “Posthuman, All Too Human.” Theory Culture & Society 23 (7–8): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069232.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2002. “Writing as a Nomadic Subject.” Hypatia 17 (3): 165–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb01180.x.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Caracciolo, Marco. 2020. “We-Narrative and the Challenges of Nonhuman Collectives.” Style 54 (1): 86. https://doi.org/10.5325/style.54.1.0086.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35 (2): 197–222.
Choudhury, Murshed Haider. 2019. “Amitav Ghosh’s Experimentation with Languages and Dialects in Ibis Trilogy.” European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies 7 (2): 1–8.
DeLoughrey, Elizabeth, Jill Didur, and Anthony Carrigan, eds. 2015. Global Ecologies and the Environmental Humanities. New York: Routledge.
DeLoughrey, Elizabeth. 2022. “Kinship in the Abyss: Submerging withThe Deep.” Atlantic Studies 20 (2): 348–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14788810.2022.2080462.
Doğanay, Yanki Doruk. 2025. “Revisiting Feminist Contentions Through a Lacanian Lens: Relapsing Into the Cartesian Subject Amidst Inclusion and Exclusion Dynamics.” Cultural Critique 127 (1): 82–111. https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2025.a957077.
Falcon, Joshua. 2022. “Toward a Critical Posthuman Geography.” Cultural Geographies 30 (1): 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740221110579.
Ghosh, Amitav. 2019. Gun Island. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Ghosh, Amitav. 2016. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ghosh, Amitav. 2004. The Hungry Tide. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Ghosh, Amitav. 2021. The Nutmeg’s Curse: Parables for a Planet in Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gilroy, Paul. 1993. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. London: Verso.
Gülüm, Erol, Paul Leworthy, Justyna Tabaszewska, and Hanna Teichler. 2024. “Memory and Environment.” Memory Studies Review. 1 (1): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1163/29498902-20240007.
Haraway, Donna J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Haraway, Donna J. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, Donna. 2006. “Encounters with Companion Species: Entangling Dogs, Baboons, Philosophers, and Biologists.” Configurations 14 (1): 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.0.0002.
Huggan, Graham, and Helen Tiffin. 2009. Postcolonial Ecocriticism. London: Routledge.
Ilas, Constantin. 2025. “Narrating the Anthropocene Literary Resistance and Ecological Anxiety in Contemporary Climate Fiction.” International Journal of Arts and Social Science 8 (6): 232–43.
Jean-François, Emmanuel Bruno, Turni Chakrabarti, Abdur Rahoof Ottathingal, Kirk B. Sides, and Anuj Vaidya. 2022. “Codex: Entangled Histories, Relational Methodologies, and Worlding Imaginaries: A Collaborative Review of Amitav Ghosh’s Historical Fictions.” Verge Studies in Global Asias 8 (1): 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/vrg.2022.0016.
Jindal, Akshi, Surbhi Saraswat, and Anita Sharma. 2025. “Tidal Histories: Environmental Displacement and Subaltern Ecologies in Amitav Ghosh’s the Hungry Tide.” International Journal of Environmental Sciences 11 (12s): 318–27. https://doi.org/10.64252/dgxyag48.
La Torre Lagares, Elidio. 2020. “Hyperglossia in Olga Tokarczuk’s Flights.” HyperCultura 9: 1–12.
Lei, Xiaochun. 2024. “The Nonhuman and Coming Community in the Selected Works of Olga Tokarczuk.” Textual Practice 39 (11): 1756–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2024.2380267.
Michna, Natalia Anna. 2020. “More-than-human World? A Posthumanist Critiqueof Anthropocentrism in the Art of Olga Tokarczuk and Patricia Piccinini.” Technoetic Arts 18 (2): 145–58. https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00034_1.
Mignolo, Walter D., and Arturo Escobar, eds. 2013. Globalization and the Decolonial Option. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315868448.
Mortensen, Ellen. 2021. “The Fury’s Revenge: An Ecofeminist Reading of OlgaTokarczuk’s Drive Your Plow Over the Bones of the Dead.” Scando Slavica 67 (2): 227–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00806765.2021.1994002.
Neumann, Birgit. 2019. “Narrative Forms in the Age of the Anthropocene: Negotiating Human-Nonhuman Relations in Global South Novels.” In Narrative in Culture, edited by Andrea Grewe, Olav Krämer, and Susanne Schlünder, 91–108. De Gruyter.
Nixon, Rob. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press.
Nora, Pierre. 1989. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux De Mémoire. ”Representations 26 (January): 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520.
Novák, Radomil. 2024. “The Polyphonic Principle in the Novelistic Thinking of Olga Tokarczuk.” Neohelicon 52 (1): 409–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-024-00758-5.
Phillips, Kendall R., and Mitchell G. Reyes, eds. 2011. Global Memoryscapes: Contesting Remembrance in a Transnational Age. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Plumwood, Val. 2002. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
Roy, Paddaja. 2024. “Connecting and Creating Narratives: Interrogating Myth, Legends, and the Anthropocene in Amitav Ghosh’s Gun Island.” In Environmental Humanities in India, edited by Debajyoti Biswas and Ryan John C., 189–202. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3933-2_12.
Soni, Amit Kumar. 2022. “Myth and Ecology: An Ecocritical Study of Amitav Ghosh’s the Hungry Tide.” IRJMSH 13 (2): 489–98.
Tokarczuk, Olga. 2019. “Nobel Lecture by Olga Tokarczuk.” https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/2018/tokarczuk/lecture/.
Tokarczuk, Olga. 2019. Drive Your Plow Over the Bones of the Dead. Translated by Antonia Lloyd-Jones. New York: Riverhead Books.
Tokarczuk, Olga. 2017. Flights. Translated by Jennifer Croft. London: Fitzcarraldo Editions.
Tokarczuk, Olga. 2010. Primeval and Other Times. Twisted Spoon Press.
Tokarczuk, Olga. 2022. Vnímavý vypravěč (The Tender Narrator). Brno: Host.
Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. 1995. Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Beacon Press.
Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wertsch, James V., and Henry L. Roediger. 2008. “Collective Memory: Conceptual Foundations and Theoretical Approaches.” Memory 16 (3): 318–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701801434.
© by the author, licensee Polish Journal of English Studies. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Received: 2025-07-21; reviewed 2025-10-19; accepted 2025-11-02